| C00546-2026 |
| Title of Each Class | Number of Shares of Common Stock Outstanding and Amount of Debt Outstanding | |
|---|---|---|
| COMMON STOCK P 0.25 PAR VALUE | 5,708,359,504 |
The Exchange does not warrant and holds no responsibility for the veracity of the facts and representations contained in all corporate disclosures, including financial reports. All data contained herein are prepared and submitted by the disclosing party to the Exchange, and are disseminated solely for purposes of information. Any questions on the data contained herein should be addressed directly to the Corporate Information Officer of the disclosing party.
Premiere Horizon Alliance CorporationPHA| Subject of the Disclosure |
|---|
On 25 September 2025, the Office of the Prosecutor of Pasig City (“OPPC”) issued its resolution on the criminal complaint filed by Premiere Horizon Alliance Corporation (“PHA” or “Corporation”) against respondents Augusto Antonio C. Serafica, Jr. (“Mr. Serafica”), Andres A. Del Rosario (“Mr. Del Rosario”), and Raul Ma. F. Anonas (“Mr. Anonas”), (collectively, the “Respondents”). The Resolution was received by PHA on 12 January 2026. |
| Background/Description of the Disclosure |
PHA filed before the OPPC a criminal complaint for Estafa under Articles 315 (1) (b) and (2) (a) and/or Qualified Theft under Article 310 in relation to Article 308 of the Revised Penal Code (“RPC”), as well as for violation of Section 168 of the Revised Corporation Code (“RCC”) against the Respondents, who were former directors and/or officers of the Corporation. |
| Name of the court or agency in which the proceedings are pending | Prosecutor’s Office, Pasig City |
|---|---|
| Date Instituted | Aug 5, 2025 |
| Docket Number | NPS Docket Nos. XV-14-INV-25H-02476; XV-14-INV-25H-02477; and XV-14-INV-25H-02478 |
| Principal Parties |
|---|
The complainant is the Corporation and the respondents are Messrs. Serafica, Del Rosario, and Anonas. |
| Nature and description of the legal proceedings |
PHA initiated criminal proceedings against the Respondents for Estafa under Articles 315 (1) (b) and (2) (a) and/or Qualified Theft under Article 310 of the RPC, as well as for Violation of Section 168 of the RCC |
| The effect(s) on the Issuer's business or operations, if any |
The Board of Directors of the Corporation does not anticipate that the resolution issued by the OPPC will have any adverse impact on the business operations or financial position of PHA, noting that the resolution was issued in the Corporation’s favor. |
| Other Relevant Information |
Amending to correct the date instituted. |
| Name | Geronimo Halili |
|---|---|
| Designation | Director/SEC Compliance Officer |